How The MLB Can Fix It’s Umpire Problem
The MLB has an umpire problem. That has never been clearer than it is right now after Sunday’s game in Baltimore, when Mike Estabrook called several balls strikes even though they were way off of the plate, and then had the nerve to get chesty with Rob Thomson.
Criticizing umpires and refs is nothing new. For as long as sports have existed, fans of every sport, in every country, have taken out their wrath on the rule-keepers of that sport. Nobody likes the person in black and white pinstripes, or in baseball’s case, the man in black.
But the recent uptick in umpire complaints is not an overreaction. The umpire problem is real. On a regular basis, umpires are inserting themselves into games in ways that make the game worse. It’s not just balls and strikes, though that is a big part of it. We have seen mistakes in other parts of the game too. We have also seen umpires being way too quick to toss players or managers.
So how do they fix the umpire problem? Here are some easy fixes.
Automatic Strikezone
The first thing they need is already in motion. You may have heard the term robo-umps. What that means is an automatic strike zone. We have had the technology to have a nearly perfect strike zone for years now. Fans can do it from home on their phones
The MLB has been slow to implement it because it would take away the “human element.” I don’t get that argument at all. The human element I want in the game is from the players and the managers. Them making mistakes is part of the game. Umpire mistakes are not a thing that makes games better.
No umpire is perfect. It would be insane to expect perfection. Calling balls and strikes by eye is incredibly hard. But we can make it easier. We can make it 99% accurate. Why would we not want that?
It is not taking a job away. They will still need an umpire at home plate to relay the ball and strike calls, and to call close plays at the plate. It will just take that responsibility off their plate. It will lead to a more accurate game. No more would we have games marred by an umpire with a wild strike zone.
Unfortunately, it looks like they are doing a challenge system first. For me, that is the worst option available. Why waste time with challenges when we can get the call right to begin with? Hopefully that quickly turns into a full automatic strike zone.
No More Quick Ejections
Baseball is the only sport where the umpire/ref can just eject someone on a whim. Every other sport has warnings or requires a severe foul.
In Basketball, it requires two technical fouls or two flagrants. If you argue and get a tech, you now at least know any future complaining can get you tossed. If you complain again, it is on you. In soccer, you need two yellow cards or one red. In hockey or football, you need to try to hurt someone intentionally.
But in the MLB, Umps can do it at any time. Look at the ump wrong, he can toss you. We saw Bryce Harper get tossed in the 1st inning for asking the ump where a ball was that he called a strike. Yankees Manager Aaron Boone was tossed because a fan heckled the umpire.
Umpires shouldn’t be impacting the game just because their feelings got hurt. Think back to last Spring training when an umpire tossed JT Realmuto because he thought JT intentionally pulled his glove away when the ump was dropping a ball into his glove. It was only Spring training, so it didn’t matter too much. but it was still a complete misuse of power by the umpire.
Umpires abuse that power far too much now. To the point that the MLB needs to take it away. What should replace it? Maybe a warning system. The MLB has it informally, where they can warn both benches. Make that official and expand it to giving individual players and managers warnings.
Argue once, and you get warned. Argue again, and you can be tossed. But we need to stop letting umps just do it in rash moments where they got their feelings hurt. Fans shouldn’t be subjected to watching a bench player in place of Bryce Harper just because a grown man can’t handle someone saying something to them.
Will Those 2 Things Fix The Umpire Problem?
I’m not sure if those two things will fix the entire umpire problem. But it would take away the two biggest problems we currently have.
Most plays outside of balls and strikes, are reviewable. Making balls and strikes reviewable, instead of using the automatic strike zone, would make the game last too long. Why waste time, when we can instantly get the right call?
It is a simple fix, that will make the game better. So will changing the way the league handles ejections. The umpire problem has gone far enough. We see too many instances where umpires impact the game. That needs to change.