Saquon Barkley is an Eagle. They landed one of the top free agents on the market yesterday. It took a 3-year, $38 million contract, but they landed Saquon. The reaction in Philly was overwhelmingly positive. Which makes sense. Barkley is among the most talented players in the league. He is the best RB they have had since LeSean McCoy. He has been banged up a bit, and running behind the worst O-Line in the league, so his numbers dipped a bit. But no one will argue that Barkley is not an elite talent at RB.
On the other hand, it is paying an RB. Even great RBs have sometimes turned into a disaster once they get a big contract. It is a position that tends to wear down quickly. We have seen more and more teams devalue their position. That is why Saquon Barkley is available to begin with. The Giants did not want to pay him. They didn’t think he was worth it. That does not mean they are right. But it is a belief shared by many in the NFL. We saw Josh Jacobs, Dalvin Cook, among many more RBs not get that big deal with the team that drafted them.
So are they right? Or is Saquon Barkley so good that he is worth bucking that trend? With how good the Eagles’ O-line is, do they even need an elite O-line? Or does having that great O-Line make having a great RB to go with it even more worthwhile?
Read More About the Eagles Moves In Free Agency Here:
- Eagles Bolster Their Offense By Stealing Saquon Barkley From The Giants
- Eagles Free Agency Tracker: Grading Every Move They Make
- Eagles Sign Edge-Rusher Bryce Huff To Record-Breaking Deal
Here are some of the Pros and Cons Of the Saquon Barkley Signing: