Spend one minute on Phillies Twitter, and you will witness one of the most tired debates in Philly sports. The Kyle Schwarber leadoff debate. Schwarber has led off for the Phillies the past two seasons. In that time, they came two wins away from a World Series and 1 away from making it there last season. But clearly, they just aren’t a good enough team with him leading off to win anything.
The issue lies with him not being your prototypical leadoff hitter. His average was already low. But last year it dipped below .200. He also lacks the speed of your typical leadoff hitter. So if you are looking for an old-school leadoff hitter, Schwarber is not it.
Who says someone needs to be prototypical though? What the Phillies have done, works. With Kyle Schwarber leading off, they have been one of the most productive lineups in baseball the past two seasons. And he has a lot to do with that.
But even with all of the success they have had, there are still people convinced that it just can’t work. They spread the same myths over and over again. Even though they all know Schwarber will lead off again. Because you dont fix something that isn’t broken. And given how many runs the Phillies have put up with Schwarber leading off, it is not broken.
So I am here to bust some of those myths. Mostly because I have had people in my Twitter mentions all week perpetuating those myths, and I am sick of seeing them. Things like his average is too low to leadoff. He blocks Turner’s speed. Schwarber loses out on RBIs batting leadoff. Or the craziest one, they have come up short because he was the leadoff hitter. All of them are wrong, and I will prove it.